Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:53:46 -0400
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <uva7nq$3r9oj$2@news.mixmin.net>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <757fef4d5b.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>
 <uv504p$3d51p$3@news.mixmin.net> <uv5jpb$rpb9$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv7lda$3kigb$4@news.mixmin.net> <uv96kp$1q905$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 02:53:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc";
	logging-data="4040467"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uv96kp$1q905$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3479
Lines: 67

Chris wrote:
> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>> David Higton wrote:
>>>>> In message <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me>
>>>>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh and the election wasn't stolen.
>>>>>
>>>>> The reality, i.e. what was determined from the observable facts, was
>>>>> that
>>>>
>>>> ...they stopped counting in the middle of the night,
>>>
>>> As per their rules (in a few counties) laid down before the election began.
>>> People are allowed to sleep.
>>
>> Only to resume counting a relatively short time later?
>>
>> Furthermore, if you are counting mail-in votes (which should be
>> banned), you should be required to remain in that room until it's
>> DONE. No exceptions.
> 
> Says who? It'll solve nothing.
> 
> There's only one reason why you want to ban mail-in ballots.
> 
>>>> threw out the
>>>> observers,
>>>
>>> Because they were trying to interfere with the count.
>>
>> No they weren't.
>>
>>> They were no longer observers.
>>
>> They were observers.
>>
>>>> and trucked in enough fraudulent ballots to swing the
>>>> election.
>>>
>>> Didn't happen.
>>
>> They had overwhelming motive and opportunity. Therefore, it is
>> reasonable to shift the burden of proof to those who claim the
>> election was clean.
> 
> Already happened. All of Trump's cases claiming the above were either
> dismissed or found against him. 0/62 is an impressive failure rate.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election

All that proves is that the courts are thoroughly corrupt. A lot of those
cases were dismissed on procedural grounds.

> You keep crying.
> 
>>> In all cases of voter fraud two things were discovered 1) in no instance
>>> was there enough to come close to affect any vote, 2) most of the
>>> fraudulent ballots were in favour of GOP candidates.
>>
>> "Cases of voter fraud" as reported by the fake media, which simply
>> does not report cases of fraud in favor of Democrat candidates.
> 
> lol. If you really believe this, living life must be difficult for you.
> 
>