Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 23:06:15 -0400
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:06:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc";
	logging-data="500374"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4492
Lines: 83

Chris wrote:
> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases,
>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  -  in most civilised
>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a
>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not morally.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've
>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one
>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS.
>>>>
>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women,
>>>
>>> What the fuck does that mean?
>>>
>>>> then why wasn't
>>>> he criminally prosecuted?
>>>
>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially
>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the
>>> CJS for a long time.
>>
>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL!
>>
>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false.
> 
> Spoken like a true misogynist.

Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein.

> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd
> prefer the wild west.
> 
>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Countless, really? Examples.
>>>
>>> Notable you didn't answer this.
>>
>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
>> if you really want to get into that debate.
> 
> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.

Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.

> When everyone is carrying a gun

But not everyone carries a gun.

> you can't differentiate between the good
> and bad guys. When you ban guns the bad guys are easy to spot.
> 
> But "muh freedom" is more important. Idiots the lot of them.