Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v00rv0$3p34l$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: [OT] The dumb and the guilty (Was Re: How many ....) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:53:53 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 53 Message-ID: <v00rv0$3p34l$1@dont-email.me> References: <199e94ddd32456be8b7d600a5058347b@dizum.com> <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me> <uvupro$m3g$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me> <v00dpo$18bo$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v00pom$3okjc$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="57f626d5d5ce868fd51911f98e08cb7a"; logging-data="3968149"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+iEfqtkB1LomwQbh4U2S5M" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LLK23oYnFM0a3AVzIxhfZU3mRU0= sha1:+UnQceX3ITV8uwXeYRclXT+tbKQ= Bytes: 2705 solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote: > The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote: > >> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>, >> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The idiot insisted: >>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>, >>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The idiot inquired: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The idiot inquired: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What facts? The skewed facts? >>>>> >>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them? >>>>> >>>> >>>> You base your research on tradition. >>>> >>> >>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them? >>> >> >> SP - no discernment! >> > > DY - no answers! > > Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them? > Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he must mean “well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume that when he says “skewed” he means “well-laid-out”. He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual senses, since he can’t explain what he means by them. -- “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor