Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: how
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:49:47 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v0geub$2a19r$3@i2pn2.org>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <v01ggs$3tc37$1@dont-email.me>
 <L2UhMbkkW3TeMvDoHPdBrhXFsds@jntp> <v068oc$137lt$1@dont-email.me>
 <hJLbsBln3PsUHAxhjVb27EqPUbo@jntp>
 <0fb574df-6dab-465b-9de7-97f0826d7f9e@att.net>
 <5CEq-_0rkY18kpL2FG3KH65W0Lg@jntp> <v0c3n7$2538n$3@i2pn2.org>
 <V2ROVHVyNn8DKH24DsjVtR7I5C0@jntp> <v0f20n$28f0q$1@i2pn2.org>
 <UM7wKwXAIk3SfQ0MR8yg-U-xiMw@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:49:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2426171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <UM7wKwXAIk3SfQ0MR8yg-U-xiMw@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2034
Lines: 41

On 4/26/24 10:41 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 26/04/2024 à 04:03, Richard Damon a écrit :
> 
>>> If ω is existing, then something is next.
>>
>> next above, yes, ω+1
>>
>> next below, no,
> 
> I disagree.

Which makes you wrong.

> 
>> the problem is the set below it is unbounded,
> 
> The set is bounded by ω.

But ω isn't in the set, so it can't be the upper bound of the set that 
is below ω

Your logic just said that ω is the number before ω, so got stuck in a 
infinite loop.

After all, if the number below ω is the upper bound of the set of 
Natural Numbers, and that is itself ω, then the number below ω must be ω 
by your logic.

BOOM.

> 
>> and thus doesn't have a "highest" value in it.
> 
> The value is there but invisible.
> 

Nope. No such thing.

> Regards, WM
> 
>