Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union
 leader calls for consequences
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:19:01 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com>
 <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me>
 <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 17:19:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c1730ace7618f99c718c5118c481b7e9";
	logging-data="3721425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+YVhmbwnS69F53yYiqQV6u4610b14yXcY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gA7kpNruSTJNjDBq4kmiP2/0hRk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 3539

On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>    In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>>    On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of
>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the
>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
>>>>>    
>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
>>>>
>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have said.
>>>
>>> How about the truth?
>>
>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
>> carries some risk.
> 
> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that
> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
> 
> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective".
> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested
> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)

People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told.  And 
people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told. 
So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, 
the vaccine very much was.  Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to 
strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.