Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union
 leader calls for consequences
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 22:52:42 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <v1ujlq$3uc8o$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com>
 <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me>
 <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-ACE9E8.15333813052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v1u6e3$3o2h8$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-72BEA9.16305413052024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 04:52:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1fc6a22e3e780876bb90be025b106293";
	logging-data="4141336"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/+ogQ8QG4B0bCjcrQAHf8Xe0fnHa58o0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sibpkFya8+6M5dE5DF/XJ+br+pM=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-72BEA9.16305413052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5786

On 5/13/2024 7:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v1u6e3$3o2h8$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/2024 6:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v1u2bf$3n232$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>       moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>          moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have
>>>>>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How about the truth?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
>>>>>>>>>> carries some risk.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and
>>>>>>>>> effective".
>>>>>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who
>>>>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And
>>>>>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are*
>>>>>>>> told.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
>>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
>>>>>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have
>>>>>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except for the people who were injured by it.
>>>>
>>>> This just in:  Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow...
>>>
>>> This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're
>>> not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss
>>> of their livelihood.
>>
>> I'll bet that *all* the risks of *any* vaccine will run to thousands of
>> words
> 
> The government has the bandwidth.

But the issue is that the public doesn't.