Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v2n7ov$32fi2$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!campaignwiki.org!.POSTED.staticline-31-183-192-166.toya.net.pl!not-for-mail
From: Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd
Subject: Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 12:31:22 +0200
Organization: Campaign Wiki
Message-ID: <v2n7ov$32fi2$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
References: <v0dmh2$1rvpq$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
 <v0dqv3$323o9$4@dont-email.me> <7ivk2j560cru7gbb1eb1gl0drn76k2pg6b@4ax.com>
 <v0e6v4$1u868$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki> <v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 11:02:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: sibirocobombus.campaignwiki; posting-host="staticline-31-183-192-166.toya.net.pl:31.183.192.166";
	logging-data="3227202"; mail-complaints-to="alex@alexschroeder.ch"
User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Hamster/2.1.0.1548
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6WxWXJ+DVclRKJ5+KXSyNHQAtcM= sha256:zuamoc0Z8ThWZNlPBJontWUzJ5D4KClfLCxYfxV8NrE=
	sha1:65jPAhmM3opKMt4DxX7FT5nJ1x0= sha256:fvpo18wSWK94Aiti/cuYuYhUOiSfY1sBiZ5ZycJ3BNY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2278
Lines: 23

On 4/25/2024 11:43 PM, Justisaur wrote:
> On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
>> On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
> 
>>
>> Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On 
>> the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just 
>> variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions. 
> 
> Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e  I liked the iterations 
> in that edition much better.  They both feel like they should be 
> sub-classes and in optional books.  Do you really need 3 charisma based 
> arcane full caster base classes in the PHB?  Heck there's only 2 full 
> physical classes.
> 
> As much as I love psionics, I'd prefer 

Nitpick: sorcerers were a core class in 3e. Warlocks came in a 
supplement in 3.5.

I never really got sorcerers, I think they were supposed to be what the 
warlock became later, just that it wasn't mechanically set apart from 
wizards all that much.