Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3uvof$22ru0$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:51:24 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 169
Message-ID: <v3uvof$22ru0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-7B9062.19350203062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v3nbkm$fr5l$3@dont-email.me> <x_WcnRlz0JjqH8L7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:51:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e3920458a2d30a66f26cb3726f5e6f16";
	logging-data="2191296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+zudemcWDQrnLFx4d7wiRl"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+WNkBjnEkkxGYlcNIhfJ5QnrdYg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <x_WcnRlz0JjqH8L7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 10686

On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>   In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>   FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>   On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   
>>>>>>>>>   So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because
>>>>>>>>>   he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   How does eating out affect my life?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is
>>>>>>>>   another matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to do exactly
>>>>>>>   that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire
>>>>>>>   country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How
>>>>>>>   does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida
>>>>>>>   affect your life, Effa?
>>>   
>>>   Still no answer here.
>>>   
>>>>>>>   But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt,
>>>>>>>   he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact that in many
>>>>>>>   cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like
>>>>>>>   when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole
>>>>>>>   country because California is such a large percentage of the car market,
>>>>>>>   vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards
>>>>>>>   regardless of where they'll eventually be sold.
>>>>>
>>>>>>   Newsom went out to eat.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he
>>>>>   went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice.
>>>>>   Cruz only did it once.
>>>>>
>>>>>>   DeSantis is destroying a state.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.
>>>   
>>>>   Nope. False equivalence.
>>>>
>>>>   Newsom owned up to it.
>>>   
>>>   Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got
>>>   caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was
>>>   wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while
>>>   he his state was on fire.
>>>   
>> You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.
> 
> To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
> 
> This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is
> ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest
> management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the
> severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
> 
> Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and rode
> our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is completely
> delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep saying
> that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire year
> (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are bald-faced
> liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
> 
> Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres
> burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there were
> any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in
> California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a 500-year
> drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts, but
> that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians claiming
> this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media
> lackeys.
> 
> Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either
> carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called logging. We
> had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we began
> imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal
> level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to carry
> out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly severe
> forest fires.
> 
> We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests since
> 1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same
> period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the
> boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and the
> public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost exactly
> in many cases.
> 
> Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and burn
> them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
> 
> An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When there
> are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that
> dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be set
> ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the land
> can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an
> opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that there are
> currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just waiting
> to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want half
> the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way.
> 
> That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically
> manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to keep
> them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for
> decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering
> with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a hands-off
> approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast
> frequently ablaze.
> 
> The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear away
> dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and conduct
> controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires. Then
> came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those they
> considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do things.
> Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh?
> 
> But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom,
> Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be solved
> with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if the
> U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry,
> gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we lived
> that way for the next 80 years, it would only reduce the global mean
> temperature by 0.3 degrees. That's from the U.N. IPCC model itself. You can go
> run the numbers yourself if you don't believe it.
> 
> These wildfires are not a 'climate change' problem. They're a forest
> management problem. Period.
> 
> 

What a fucking piece of shit you are.  Talking to you is like talking to 
Trump, just without the warmth.

You talk a big game, but I'm quoting NOAA.

> NEWS & EVENTS
> Study Finds Climate Change to Blame For Record-Breaking California Wildfires
> Published onAugust 8, 2023

> In a new NIDIS-funded study in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, an international group of researchers created a climate-driven model of summer burned area evolution in California and combined it with natural and historical climate simulations to assess the importance of human-caused climate change on increased burned areas.
> 
> It was found that nearly all the observed increase in burned areas over the past half-century is due to human-caused climate change. It is estimated that from 1971 to 2021, human-caused climate change contributed to a +172% increase in burned areas, with a  +320% increase from 1996 to 2021. In the coming decades, a further increase in annual forest burned areas is expected, ranging from 3% to 52%.

https://www.drought.gov/news/study-finds-climate-change-blame-record-breaking-california-wildfires-2023-08-08#:~:text=Study%20Finds%20Climate%20Change%20to%20Blame%20For%20Record%2DBreaking%20California%20Wildfires,-Published%20on&text=Record%2Dbreaking%20forest%20fires%20during,negative%20consequences%20for%20human%20health.

You are so full of shit, it ain't even funny anymore.


-- 
On May 30, 2024 Donald J. Trump was unanimously convicted on 34 felony 
counts in New York City... so I took this picture in my side yard.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0