Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3vk3m$265uv$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Running an editor from ANSI C Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:38:46 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 38 Message-ID: <v3vk3m$265uv$1@dont-email.me> References: <v3pge7$uf2i$1@dont-email.me> <v3r2pl$16mtl$1@dont-email.me> <v3r7v8$1b57j$1@dont-email.me> <v3rek5$1c4i5$1@dont-email.me> <v3rrtm$1e6g8$1@dont-email.me> <v3ru84$1eafb$1@dont-email.me> <87o78dzw1a.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v3tkmb$1o860$3@dont-email.me> <v3uk0l$20s0s$2@dont-email.me> <v3uoeo$21g4g$5@dont-email.me> <v3v6jt$23q0b$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 20:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3d5cf5214f2d8b45c65425247320c56d"; logging-data="2299871"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196eC8hO/K5FFWk2b5k21wxZKHWpagGzTc=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:jXQQCdrZ3/57zP8JcAcUFrTUbkw= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <v3v6jt$23q0b$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2838 On 07/06/2024 15:48, David Brown wrote: > On 07/06/2024 12:46, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:31:01 +0200, David Brown wrote: >> >>> But many people have lots of use of programming in C without any kind of >>> POSIX functionality ... >> >> And all those same programs work in the presence of POSIX functionality, >> plus you get access to a whole lot more besides. > > No, they do not. > > And even if POSIX functionality were "present", whatever you mean by > that, it would be of no help to many C programs. > >> >> The fact that cases keep arising where POSIX functionality would solve >> problems that are discussed in this group belies your point. > > There's no doubt that for some C programming, there are POSIX functions > that could help. And no doubt that this is the case for Malcolm's project. > > That does not in any way demonstrate that POSIX is required for all C > programming, or that C is "essentially crippled" if POSIX is not available. > Any idiot can write a shell using Posix. The whole point is to it in pure C. Without a single call to a function that isn't in the C standard library. And make it fully functional. A real shell, that people will want to really use. That's my hobby project. I'm a free man now. I've got the time. I don't have to write code that makes money any more. -- Check out Basic Algorithms and my other books: https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/bgy1mm