Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail
From: Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research
Subject: Equivalence principle
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 19:40:15 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Approved: hees@itp.uni-frankfurt.de (sci.physics.research)
Message-ID: <v4251v$2mpbj$2@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: news.dfncis.de 4rz7gqqPpW1ns929bfCcXAfFELy/tIHcIlMNZ0+KRD5lNwl6iKlqIBRKhP
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZSLBEl6QzfTFMBKePu2F8VupmGI= sha256:+xKe+8WYXoePA3IdoEIUeTZ21iasPjhtDmcb64pLXtI=
Bytes: 1658

the surface of a planet.

So, I ask: what stops us from measuring the presence (or absence) of
tidal forces? If tidal forces are there, then we are stationary on the
surface of a planet, if they are not there, we are experiencing a
non-gravitational acceleration.

Luigi Fortunati

[Moderator's remark: One has to keep in mind that the equivalence
principle is a local concept, i.e., the equivalence between the
observations in a gravitational field and in an accelerated frame of
reference in free space refers only to very small space-time regions. A
"true gravitational field" is of course never entirely equivalent to an
accelerated frame in flat Minkowski space, because according to GR the
gravitational field leads to space-time curvature, i.e., a non-vanishing
Riemann tensor, while Minkowski space is flat, which are
coordinate-independent notions, and only such notions are physically
interpretable. 

Of course tidal forces are well observable, cf. the tides on Earth,
where the name "tidal force" refers to.

HvH.]