Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:18:49 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 300
Message-ID: <v4aiga$18p9k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3uvof$22ru0$1@dont-email.me>
 <akSdnTp7Xod4lPj7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v46nj2$dg7s$3@dont-email.me>
 <HcKdnbj3yKOqqfr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <17d7e76cd8efdd72$13635$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:18:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58424f7a7bb30b8e45b5386210dd4adf";
	logging-data="1336628"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OZcps5w2kqwBcqrLER3T4VFSoaD34ShU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b+X4i8Ej/u4PNgrd6uL9xV0zRAo=
In-Reply-To: <17d7e76cd8efdd72$13635$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 13854

On 6/11/2024 4:57 AM, trotsky wrote:
> On 6/10/24 12:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>   On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>   On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>     On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>     On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>       In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP 
>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>       wrote:
>>>>>>>>>       On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>       In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPP 
>>>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>       wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>       FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       So when you said you don't talk about another 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state's governor because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it... a lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       How does eating out affect my life?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the country is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       another matter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Your own words: another state's governor doesn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>> affect my life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> power to
>>>>>>>>>>>> do exactly
>>>>>>>>>>>>       that by "destroying capitalism and education" 
>>>>>>>>>>>> throughout the entire
>>>>>>>>>>>>       country by signing laws that only apply to their 
>>>>>>>>>>>> respective states. How
>>>>>>>>>>>>       does DeSantis signing an education bill that only 
>>>>>>>>>>>> applies to Florida
>>>>>>>>>>>>       affect your life, Effa?
>>>>>>>>       Still no answer here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>       But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to Effa the Hutt,
>>>>>>>>>>>>       he only has the power to affect California, despite 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the fact
>>>>>>>>>>>> that in many
>>>>>>>>>>>>       cases, he actually does affect the whole country with 
>>>>>>>>>>>> his bullshit. Like
>>>>>>>>>>>>       when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That 
>>>>>>>>>>>> affects the whole
>>>>>>>>>>>>       country because California is such a large percentage 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the car market,
>>>>>>>>>>>>       vehicle manufacturers conform their products to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> California standards
>>>>>>>>>>>>       regardless of where they'll eventually be sold.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Newsom went out to eat.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties 
>>>>>>>>>> in a twist: he
>>>>>>>>>>       went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he 
>>>>>>>>>> did it twice.
>>>>>>>>>>       Cruz only did it once.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       DeSantis is destroying a state.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.
>>>>>>>>>       Nope. False equivalence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Newsom owned up to it.
>>>>>>>>       Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. 
>>>>>>>> Once he got
>>>>>>>>       caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the 
>>>>>>>> French Laundry was
>>>>>>>>       wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation 
>>>>>>>> in Cabo while
>>>>>>>>       he his state was on fire.
>>>>>>>     You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.
>>>>>>     To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
>>>>>>     This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 
>>>>>> 'climate change' is
>>>>>>     ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically 
>>>>>> bad forest
>>>>>>     management at both the federal and state level is a major 
>>>>>> factor in the
>>>>>>     severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
>>>>>>     Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar 
>>>>>> panels and
>>>>>> rode
>>>>>>     our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every 
>>>>>> year is
>>>>>>   completely
>>>>>>     delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians 
>>>>>> who keep
>>>>>>   saying
>>>>>>     that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the 
>>>>>> worst fire
>>>>>>   year
>>>>>>     (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' 
>>>>>> are
>>>>>>   bald-faced
>>>>>>     liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
>>>>>>     Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 
>>>>>> million acres
>>>>>>     burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. 
>>>>>> Before there
>>>>>>   were
>>>>>>     any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive 
>>>>>> droughts in
>>>>>>     California long before the era of 'climate change'. California 
>>>>>> had a
>>>>>>   500-year
>>>>>>     drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented 
>>>>>> scientific facts,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>>     that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from 
>>>>>> politicians
>>>>>>   claiming
>>>>>>     this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by 
>>>>>> their media
>>>>>>     lackeys.
>>>>>>     Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. 
>>>>>> It's either
>>>>>>     carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was 
>>>>>> called
>>>>>> logging.
>>>>>>   We
>>>>>>     had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 
>>>>>> 70s, we
>>>>>> began
>>>>>>     imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state 
>>>>>> and federal
>>>>>>     level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly 
>>>>>> unprofitable to
>>>>>>   carry
>>>>>>     out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is 
>>>>>> increasingly
>>>>>>   severe
>>>>>>     forest fires.
>>>>>>     We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California 
>>>>>> forests
>>>>>> since
>>>>>>     1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire 
>>>>>> over that same
>>>>>>     period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you 
>>>>>> can tell the
>>>>>>     boundary between private forestland that is not affected by 
>>>>>> these laws and
>>>>>>   the
>>>>>>     public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property 
>>>>>> lines almost
>>>>>>   exactly
>>>>>>     in many cases.
>>>>>>     Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public 
>>>>>> lands and
>>>>>>   burn
>>>>>>     them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
>>>>>>     An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself 
>>>>>> off. When
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>     are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying 
>>>>>> off, and that
>>>>>>     dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just 
>>>>>> waiting to be
>>>>>>   set
>>>>>>     ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density 
>>>>>> that the
>>>>>> land
>>>>>>     can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never 
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========