Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:19:25 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v4f9mt$3smqv$3@i2pn2.org>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v46na7$3ifov$4@i2pn2.org>
	<v48be9$rgsh$1@dont-email.me> <v48gh6$3kcoe$4@i2pn2.org>
	<v48jv2$se9c$1@dont-email.me> <v49dge$3kcoe$5@i2pn2.org>
	<v4a0hs$157ic$3@dont-email.me> <v4ak5o$3kcoe$6@i2pn2.org>
	<v4am8r$19edk$1@dont-email.me> <v4b17k$3nf9n$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v4b48k$1f89t$4@dont-email.me> <v4c12t$3oop0$4@i2pn2.org>
	<v4ck2c$1o4b4$2@dont-email.me> <v4d9gt$3qbnc$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v4daoq$1sioe$2@dont-email.me> <v4dbun$3qbnc$4@i2pn2.org>
	<v4df07$1te0b$1@dont-email.me> <v4dfsu$3qbnd$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v4dhuk$1tsdf$3@dont-email.me> <v4diet$3qbnc$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v4dj9i$1tsdf$5@dont-email.me> <v4dkp0$3qbnd$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v4dlac$225kb$2@dont-email.me> <v4dm13$3qbnc$10@i2pn2.org>
	<v4dmlu$22cmj$2@dont-email.me> <v4dnrp$3qbnd$9@i2pn2.org>
	<v4dotf$22o4a$3@dont-email.me> <v4dq7g$3qbnc$13@i2pn2.org>
	<v4dr86$2379j$2@dont-email.me> <v4el9k$3rsd6$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v4esmp$28g4v$8@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 17:19:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4086623"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3186
Lines: 32

Am Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:37:29 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/13/2024 6:31 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/13/24 12:06 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 6/12/2024 10:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/12/24 11:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/12/2024 10:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/12/24 10:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/12/2024 9:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/12/24 10:25 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/24 9:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/2024 8:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/24 9:27 PM, olcott wrote:

> The input to H(D,D) does not provide the means for H to determine the
> behavior of D(D).
Oh, sure it does. All the info is right there! Just add simulation!
You do know how that works, right?

> I keep asking you to show all of the steps of how H(D,D) determines the
> behavior of D(D) from its input and you dodge because you know that I am
> correct.
You are correct: your H does not determine the behaviour of D(D).
Why does it arbitrarily decide to halt instead of continuing the 
simulation?

> H(D,D) is not told about the behavior of D(D) and you cannot show
> otherwise with any sequence of steps of correct reasoning.
H is told about D and can simulate what it does. That's why we're looking
for a machine that finds that out for every machine.

-- 
joes