Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v4n4qt$4s4j$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Challenger
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:45:17 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <v4n4qt$4s4j$1@dont-email.me>
References: <5a5a6jtfh1je18lr297jrh10oihptl2tgo@4ax.com>
	<v43l6g$39bjl$1@dont-email.me> <c3hb6jdrp9v6rjnsd03ki2levj4ohnna8m@4ax.com>
	<v44op9$3kncn$6@dont-email.me> <3ltb6j1v7miinkbhb0f3n6gknud5j9eeb8@4ax.com>
	<v458vd$3kncn$11@dont-email.me> <v49ogt$1380c$1@dont-email.me>
	<v4ajv6$19252$1@dont-email.me> <v4badf$1gg5p$1@dont-email.me>
	<v4ckrn$1ojr5$1@dont-email.me> <v4e9al$25ht5$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:45:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0e5fb7834f5491e6b8b4e06047e3b926";
	logging-data="159891"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SfPFmLxZPl98ElDNQ+beyWLRqnEgMmak="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Hz0WxtzjvGsCQ8fHVzyE+gYqF/4=
Bytes: 4227

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:06:36 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:

> On 13/06/2024 3:11 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:06:49 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/06/2024 8:43 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:55:21 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/06/2024 8:05 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:47:50 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:29:13 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 08:08:26 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 08:21:52 +0100, Jeff Layman
>>>>>>>>> <Jeff@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/06/2024 03:42, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So about as reliable a statistic as their figures for historical
>>>>>> CO2 in the atmosphere, then.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not really. We've been observing the CO2 level in the atmosphere
>>>>> continuously since 1958 and Manua Loa wasn't NASA.
>>>>>
>>>>> The entirely independent Cape Grim observatory got going in 1976 -
>>>>> it's run by Australia's CSIRO
>>>>>
>>>>> https://capegrim.csiro.au/
>>>>>
>>>>> and presents much the same story. It's southern hemisphere rather
>>>>> than northern hemisphere so that the annual fluctuation isn't as
>>>>> big.
>>>>>
>>>>> NASA estimate of how many shuttles' they'd lose were just that -
>>>>> they dated back to before they'd lost any.
>>>>>
>>>>> You objections to the thoroughly reliable climate data involve your
>>>>> demented conspiracy theory which has everybody involved in taking
>>>>> the published the measurements consistently lying to the public for
>>>>> more than sixty years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody even thought that anyone would bother until around 1990, when
>>>>> global warming hit statistical significance, and the fossil carbon
>>>>> extraction industry woke up the threat to their long term cash
>>>>> flows.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, Bill. I've got better things to do than get drawn into another
>>>> of your pointless pissing contests.
>>>
>>> Lying about the science evidence demonstrating that climate change is
>>> happening is  a well-paid commercial activity. You aren't remotely
>>> good enough at it to get paid for it, but that doesn't seem to stop
>>> you hoping that you might.
>  >
>> Nice try, Bill, but I'm not falling for it. I know a barb when I see it
>> and I'm not getting hooked. Try plying your trade on some other poor
>> sap.
> 
> You've gotten well hooked by climate change denial propaganda, and
> thrashing around pretending to be sceptical is just more of your futile
> attempts to evade the point. The barb is deeply embedded. You probably
> need a brain implant to get off the hook, and you'd probably reject
> functional brain tissue as incompatible with your right-wing goof
> genome.

Nope. Still not tempted. You need to up your game, Bill.