Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:57:43 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 267
Message-ID: <v4s089$1btr4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3uvof$22ru0$1@dont-email.me>
 <akSdnTp7Xod4lPj7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v46nj2$dg7s$3@dont-email.me>
 <HcKdnbj3yKOqqfr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:57:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c297682e1b5a8a64069ab9d5fe6da9b";
	logging-data="1439588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/62njlda8CZ18W3l+/BEGJ"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8YR8+SC+PDX1DFHb6fmrupDkAGc=
In-Reply-To: <HcKdnbj3yKOqqfr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 14152

On 6/10/24 1:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>       In article <v3llcv$3kpo$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>       wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>       In article <v3kipd$3u0gd$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>       wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>       FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>       On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>       How does eating out affect my life?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>       Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is
>>>>>>>>>>>>       another matter.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to
>>>>>>>>>>> do exactly
>>>>>>>>>>>       that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire
>>>>>>>>>>>       country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How
>>>>>>>>>>>       does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida
>>>>>>>>>>>       affect your life, Effa?
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       Still no answer here.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>>       But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt,
>>>>>>>>>>>       he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact
>>>>>>>>>>> that in many
>>>>>>>>>>>       cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like
>>>>>>>>>>>       when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole
>>>>>>>>>>>       country because California is such a large percentage of the car market,
>>>>>>>>>>>       vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards
>>>>>>>>>>>       regardless of where they'll eventually be sold.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       Newsom went out to eat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he
>>>>>>>>>       went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice.
>>>>>>>>>       Cruz only did it once.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       DeSantis is destroying a state.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       Nope. False equivalence.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       Newsom owned up to it.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got
>>>>>>>       caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was
>>>>>>>       wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while
>>>>>>>       he his state was on fire.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>     You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     To quote our newest Hutt: Nope.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is
>>>>>     ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest
>>>>>     management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the
>>>>>     severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and
>>>>> rode
>>>>>     our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is
>>>>>   completely
>>>>>     delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep
>>>>>   saying
>>>>>     that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire
>>>>>   year
>>>>>     (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are
>>>>>   bald-faced
>>>>>     liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres
>>>>>     burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there
>>>>>   were
>>>>>     any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in
>>>>>     California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a
>>>>>   500-year
>>>>>     drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts,
>>>>> but
>>>>>     that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians
>>>>>   claiming
>>>>>     this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media
>>>>>     lackeys.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either
>>>>>     carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called
>>>>> logging.
>>>>>   We
>>>>>     had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we
>>>>> began
>>>>>     imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal
>>>>>     level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to
>>>>>   carry
>>>>>     out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly
>>>>>   severe
>>>>>     forest fires.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests
>>>>> since
>>>>>     1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same
>>>>>     period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the
>>>>>     boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and
>>>>>   the
>>>>>     public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost
>>>>>   exactly
>>>>>     in many cases.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and
>>>>>   burn
>>>>>     them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it?
>>>>>     
>>>>>     An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When
>>>>> there
>>>>>     are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that
>>>>>     dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be
>>>>>   set
>>>>>     ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the
>>>>> land
>>>>>     can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an
>>>>>     opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that
>>>>> there are
>>>>>     currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just
>>>>>   waiting
>>>>>     to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want
>>>>> half
>>>>>     the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically
>>>>>     manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to
>>>>>   keep
>>>>>     them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for
>>>>>     decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering
>>>>>     with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a
>>>>>   hands-off
>>>>>     approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast
>>>>>     frequently ablaze.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear
>>>>>   away
>>>>>     dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and
>>>>> conduct
>>>>>     controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires.
>>>>>   Then
>>>>>     came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those
>>>>> they
>>>>>     considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do
>>>>> things.
>>>>>     Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh?
>>>>>     
>>>>>     But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom,
>>>>>     Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be
>>>>> solved
>>>>>     with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if
>>>>>   the
>>>>>     U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry,
>>>>>     gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========