Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v57evd$3u7ea$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:16:29 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <v57evd$3u7ea$3@dont-email.me>
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-597F57.18352820062024@news.giganews.com>
 <17dafa563c68a967$159724$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v56qu3$3qg7n$13@dont-email.me>
 <qpWdnXSHkrbQbuv7nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 23:16:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ba6e416936843ce5425f0998d75a04d7";
	logging-data="4136394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Naz+FKgb82R5z/WGb/2zDxSbTX4P5FmY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4XVzufiLxG8foIoWPu+5lZkRuXk=
In-Reply-To: <qpWdnXSHkrbQbuv7nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4195

On 6/22/2024 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/21/24 5:17 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 6/20/24 8:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/19/24 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>       "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
>>>>>>>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice
>>>>>>>>>>>> protesters
>>>>>>>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
>>>>>>>>>>> trespassing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing
>>>>>>>>>> it for
>>>>>>>>>> 'social justice'.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
>>>>>>>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
>>>>>>>> residential neighborhood.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would you presume that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my
>>>>>> private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's
>>>>>> allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition.
>>>>>>
>>>>> They were in the street, not on McClosky's property.
>>>>
>>>> The street was private property, too, smooth brain.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lying sack o' shit alert.  Can you prove to us the McShitbags owned the
>>> street?  Of course you can't because you're a lying sack o' shit.
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't matter if the fucking King of Prussia owned the street, you
>> can't menace people with guns.
 >
> You can when they're menacing you.

Afaik, pissing you off isn't "menacing you".