Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:16:30 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <v5ba0t$re2u$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0on0tk1ebn7yw000@post.eweka.nl> <v56h06$3ooo8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v56hk7$1igf$7@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v58oh0$9461$1@dont-email.me>
 <v593hn$aiu$5@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v599mo$cbrs$1@dont-email.me>
 <d6WdO.38705$nACc.31419@fx07.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:16:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6c0960f59a0899ba11fa7b8ea25df85";
	logging-data="899166"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ykwxFYrLZuC8DrhajI6lE3TjeTqcKfsw="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KFIuxJTemBeX2Un82qSZgNcxIZc=
In-Reply-To: <d6WdO.38705$nACc.31419@fx07.ams4>
Bytes: 2641

Hornplayer9599 wrote on 24/6/24 12:15 am:
> On 6/23/2024 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
> 
>>>> I'm guessing Mike is a hell of a lot closer to Logic than YOU, 
>>>> Gobble-de-gook, are!!
>>>
>>> Wrongo, Dannyboy!
>>
>> Proof, Gobble-de-gook, Proof!!
>>
>> And have I just worked out why Gobble-de-gook complains/points out 
>> when anybody Snips the stuff that the reasonable poster is not 
>> responding to.
>>
>> That give Gobble-de-gook the ability to claim that the answer to the 
>> non-Answered Question is/was with-in that part of the message that is 
>> trimmed/snipped.
>>
>> It never is .... but he can/does make the claim!!
> 
> He can claim all he wants.  However, anyone can go back up the thread 
> and read the original post(s) that are not snipped.  He seems to forget 
> about that, unless he's going to claim that people go back and snip/trim 
> every...single...line of every...single...post in a thread to erase his 
> non-existent answer so nobody can read what he didn't say anyway.
> 
That would be correct ..... *IF* the reader were reading the posts in a 
threaded display ..... but guess who *DOESN'T* have his display set up 
in a Threaded display format!!

He just reads the posts one post after another post .... so once the 
information is snipped from a reply, Gobble-de-gook is unable to 
locate/read it!!
-- 
Daniel