Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v5gig3$158st$1@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0
 ---Boilerplate Reply
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:11:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5gig3$158st$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v50o2t$2fh98$2@dont-email.me>
	<v51dc8$2jmrd$1@dont-email.me> <v53b0s$324b4$1@dont-email.me>
	<v53tjm$35vak$1@dont-email.me> <v5415i$lkkc$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v543k2$376u3$1@dont-email.me> <v5460r$lkkc$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v54br6$38n2k$2@dont-email.me> <v54c3r$lkkc$5@i2pn2.org>
	<v54crs$38n2k$4@dont-email.me> <v5f9fh$134dk$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v5fce0$1nsua$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:11:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1221533"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2118
Lines: 17

Am Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:22:08 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/25/2024 3:31 PM, joes wrote:
>> Am Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:22:04 -0500 schrieb olcott:

>>> When there is no mapping from the finite string x86 machine language
>>> input to H(D,D) to the behavior of D(D) then H(D,D) IS NOT being asked
>>> about the behavior of D(D).
>> It means that H can't do the mapping, i.e. it is not simulating
>> correctly.
>> It does a different map that doesn't fit its specification.
> No that is incorrect. D correctly simulated by every H that can possibly
> exist does not have the same behavior of any directly executed D(D) that
> halts.
H1 simulates D the same way it would actually behave. Is that wrong?

-- 
Man kann mit dunklen Zahlen nicht rechnen. Für die eigentliche Mathematik 
sind sie vollkommen nutzlos. --Wolfgang Mückenheim