Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:37:51 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 123
Message-ID: <v5imqf$2ie27$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v5d3b4$16k7k$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5d4gj$10m6o$9@i2pn2.org> <v5d81s$17fhi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5d8fr$10m6o$12@i2pn2.org> <v5d9iv$1bem6$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5d9s6$10m6p$10@i2pn2.org> <v5daji$1bll8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5db62$10m6o$13@i2pn2.org> <v5dckm$1bteo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5e87h$12a1a$2@i2pn2.org> <v5ef4n$1ihbr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5frvi$14bcm$4@i2pn2.org> <v5fslr$1uc3o$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5fto2$14bcm$9@i2pn2.org> <v5fu06$1umhr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5fvtf$14bcn$3@i2pn2.org> <v5g1nr$1v8bm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5g24k$14bcm$10@i2pn2.org> <v5g2ds$1v8bm$3@dont-email.me>
 <v5gs85$15l89$1@i2pn2.org> <v5h5c4$24jbd$9@dont-email.me>
 <v5i8vg$17ej1$3@i2pn2.org> <v5i9fh$2cko8$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5i9j2$17ej0$2@i2pn2.org> <v5ibfc$2cko8$5@dont-email.me>
 <v5icdm$17ej1$7@i2pn2.org> <v5ie9f$2dcfs$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ieqg$17ej0$4@i2pn2.org> <v5ihn6$2hkk4$3@dont-email.me>
 <v5ijbq$17ej1$10@i2pn2.org> <v5ijq1$2i32s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ilj0$17ej1$15@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 05:37:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7b6b7ddfe8775f34f568700240d9d1b";
	logging-data="2701383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yC/T0LQmZeDZv+XGrDV10"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lazrilFds8evUOcsVblcBPP0yi0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5ilj0$17ej1$15@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 6481

On 6/26/2024 10:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/26/24 10:46 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/26/2024 9:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/26/24 10:10 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/26/2024 8:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/26/24 9:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/26/2024 7:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/26/24 8:24 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/26/2024 6:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike understands how your use of static variables is cheating.
>>>>>>>> Others here will be baffled and confused.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the rules are the rules, and you can't create rules you 
>>>>>>> didn't state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you really have such brain damage that you cannot remember
>>>>>> that we already discussed this and closed it I will start
>>>>>> praying for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> And if I am allowed, or even required to remember that, then I can 
>>>>> remember that your Hs are all designed to be Halt Deciders, and 
>>>>> thus the only correct behavior for their input is that of the 
>>>>> direct execution of the program the input represents.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> NONE-THE-LESS I WILL NOT TOLERATE YOU LEAPING TO THE CONCLUSION
>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT WITHOUT GOING THROUGH EVER SINGLE STEP.
>>>> *When you do this I will point out your specific deceit*
>>>
>>> But if you don't include the restriction, it isn't there, and the 
>>> fact we are so many steps ahead of you isn't grounds to say we don't 
>>> know what we know.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> YOU CAN'T FREAKING USE ANY STATIC LOCAL VARIABLES TO
>>>>>> CHANGE THE BEHAVIOR AND YOU KNOW WHY YOU CAN'T USE
>>>>>> THEM SO FREAKING QUIT IT !!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
>>>>>> by x86 emulator H0 cannot possibly return.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But it does, it just isn't emulated by H0.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> THAT IS THE FREAKING DAMNED LIAR STRAW-MAN DECEPTION.
>>>
>>> The "Behavior" of the input is DEFINED by the semantics of the x86 
>>> instruction set.
>>>
>>> NO instruction, other than Halt, stops the processor from continuing, 
>>> thus the behavior of the input doesn't stop just because the emulator 
>>> stoped processing it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> When I say that there are some people that are so poor
>>>> that they are starving to death and we must halt them
>>>>
>>>> you cannot (morally) say there is no need to help them
>>>> because rich people are not starving to death.
>>>
>>> RED HERRING.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christ taught in parables I teach in isomorphisms.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But broken ones, that are just RED HERRING LIES.
>>>
>>> And, I know Christ, and you are NOT Christ, and it is almost 
>>> blasphemous for you to make that comparasion, especially since you 
>>> have claimed to be God in the past.
>>>
>>> THAT WILL send you to Gehenna.
>>
>> I am not the liar here. I think that we have gone
>> way beyond reasonable doubt that you have told lies.
> 
> Really, so what statement have I said that isn't actually true.
> 
> Not just that you disagree with it, since you have been proven to be a 
> liar, but that you can actualy preove to be untrtue.
> 
> Your ignorance does not make my statements lies.
> 
>>
>> Maybe you are one of those "Christians" that believes
>> once saved always saved even if you commit genocide
>> for fun an profit.
>>
> 
> Nope. You don't know me well, so you are just making your typical wild 
> guesses with no basis.
> That is what gets you in trouble every time.
> 

As ALWAYS I hypothesize possibilities.
Since you neither confirmed nor denied it remains open.

You know that you are doing the best that you can to
disable an honest dialogue.

I have backed you into a corner on some of your lies.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer