Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re:  Ben agrees that Sipser approved criteria is met
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:04:09 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5mcc9$1cgj0$2@i2pn2.org>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v4sa0h$1dk9i$3@dont-email.me>
	<v4sci6$1ebce$1@dont-email.me> <v4sd35$1eb2f$5@dont-email.me>
	<v4u3jl$1se49$1@dont-email.me> <v4umvh$1vpm0$7@dont-email.me>
	<v50d8k$2e51s$1@dont-email.me> <v50dtp$2e5ij$1@dont-email.me>
	<v51f4t$2k8ar$1@dont-email.me> <v51ge4$2kbbe$2@dont-email.me>
	<v539bk$329sv$1@dont-email.me> <v53upb$35vak$6@dont-email.me>
	<v575pl$3sg5p$1@dont-email.me> <v5767s$3soh6$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5e28t$11urb$5@i2pn2.org> <v5eg03$1ikpr$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5eho7$24l4$1@news.muc.de> <87jzidm83f.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<v5el8c$24l4$4@news.muc.de> <v5evoi$1lgoi$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5frvn$14bcm$6@i2pn2.org> <v5ft1p$1uc3o$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5fu24$14bcn$2@i2pn2.org> <v5fuf7$1up2o$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5gk7m$22b20$1@dont-email.me> <v5h3aj$24jbd$5@dont-email.me>
	<v5j4p0$2ksq3$1@dont-email.me> <v5jrrq$2o58l$4@dont-email.me>
	<v5k0ru$2q29e$1@dont-email.me> <v5k5ko$2qsdr$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5lsba$38t1k$1@dont-email.me> <v5mb0p$3b1p0$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:04:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1458784"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2624
Lines: 18

Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:40:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/28/2024 3:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-06-27 16:56:56 +0000, olcott said:

> Deciders are always asked a yes/no question of their
> inputs in their own native language.
Yes, and the question here is „Does the input halt?” and not „Do I
simulate this to halt?”.

>>> Instead everyone here expects that the halt decider must map
>>> to the English description of what the authors of textbooks
>>> expect it to map to.
Naturally. Why should it not work as defined.

> Everyone that states an opinion says that the decider
> must go by the textbook definitions of the problem thus
> not the problem instance actually encoded by the input.
That IS the instance encoded by the input. We call H with DDD,
not H with H(DDD).