Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v7ge24$3hlc2$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Liar detector: Fred, Richard, Joes and Alan --- Honest Dialogue ?
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:28:36 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <v7ge24$3hlc2$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v644pn$29t4h$3@dont-email.me> <v6gss2$t87a$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6gv65$to0m$1@dont-email.me> <v6h2li$ud7p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6h2rm$ue7s$1@dont-email.me> <v6h3cu$ud7p$2@dont-email.me>
 <v6h83q$vag9$1@dont-email.me> <v6ikgb$19f5g$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6jgjo$1ctoi$4@dont-email.me> <v6lckp$1qi9e$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6m2qq$1tj30$6@dont-email.me>
 <60a1c2490e9bd9a5478fd173a20ed64d5eb158f9@i2pn2.org>
 <v6nvn8$2bn6q$1@dont-email.me> <v6oqti$2fuva$7@dont-email.me>
 <v6qn6k$2ubkt$1@dont-email.me> <v6r9q1$30qtt$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6tbge$3gegs$1@dont-email.me> <v6tqlm$3imib$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6vvid$24jd$1@dont-email.me> <v70mih$61d8$3@dont-email.me>
 <v72i9m$jne3$1@dont-email.me> <v7367p$mjis$8@dont-email.me>
 <v755m4$15kf6$1@dont-email.me> <v75vl9$19j7l$7@dont-email.me>
 <v77p77$1nm3r$1@dont-email.me> <v78fa7$1rc43$2@dont-email.me>
 <v7agsg$2am9u$1@dont-email.me> <v7b4l2$2e2aq$2@dont-email.me>
 <v7d9el$2tp5s$1@dont-email.me> <v7dtqt$30pvh$6@dont-email.me>
 <v7fu0f$3ff7c$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:28:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c302f5257903c7c25aa8d1f6976e7879";
	logging-data="3724674"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+s9AEIbzPtsj6vRdzsq7cw"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6hv63RMV3Ai6jcC5m8KOjHvSN5E=
In-Reply-To: <v7fu0f$3ff7c$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4677

On 7/20/2024 3:54 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-07-19 14:39:25 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 7/19/2024 3:51 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-18 13:17:22 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 7/18/2024 2:40 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-07-17 13:00:55 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/17/2024 1:43 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-07-16 14:21:28 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When simulated input DDD stops running {if and only if}
>>>>>>>> the simulation of this input DDD has been aborted this
>>>>>>>> necessitates that input DDD specifies non-halting behavior
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DDD does not stop runnig unless it is completely exeuted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>> [00002163] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002164] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD
>>>>>> [0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>>>> [00002170] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002173] 5d         pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002174] c3         ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH according to the semantic meaning of
>>>>>> its x86 instructions never stop running unless aborted.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean HHH's simulation of DDD may not termite before HHH aborts it?
>>>>
>>>> When we examine the infinite set of every HHH/DDD pair such that:
>>>> HHH₁ one step of DDD₁ is correctly emulated by HHH₁.
>>>> HHH₂ two steps of DDD₂ are correctly emulated by HHH₂.
>>>> HHH₃ three steps of DDD₃ are correctly emulated by HHH₃.
>>>> ...
>>>> HHH∞ The emulation of DDD∞ by HHH∞ never stops running.
>>>>
>>>> When each DDD of the HHH/DDD pairs above is correctly emulated
>>>> by its corresponding HHH according to the semantic meaning of its
>>>> x86 instructions it CANNOT POSSIBLY reach past its own machine
>>>> address 0000216b, not even by an act of God.
>>>
>>> You apparently mean that no HHHᵢ can simulate the corresponding DDDᵢ to
>>> its termination?
>>
>> No I don't mean that at all that incorrectly allocates the error
>> to the emulator.
> 
> Anyway you did not say that some HHHᵢ can simulate the corresponding DDDᵢ
> to its termination. And each DDDᵢ does terminate, whether simulated or not.

*Until you quit lying about this we cannot have an honest dialog*

int main()
{
   DDD();
}

Calls HHH(DDD) that must abort the emulation of its input
or {HHH, emulated DDD and executed DDD} never stop running.



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer