Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:49:02 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <v7t72e$27rc8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7h1fl$3lcvq$3@dont-email.me> <v7h224$3li66$3@dont-email.me> <v7h3je$3lcvq$6@dont-email.me> <v7h55o$2a60$1@news.muc.de> <v7m0af$n73h$2@dont-email.me> <v7nlun$1412g$4@dont-email.me> <v7of1s$17h8r$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:49:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="02bedc76074b37eacb17f68ffc18830d";
	logging-data="2354568"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19N5AfjydmgO/dScvr9pCUn"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/ODrzNvF+8T39/jY04PYnohrgZI=
Bytes: 2683

On 2024-07-23 14:34:36 +0000, olcott said:

> On 7/23/2024 2:26 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-07-22 16:10:55 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 7/20/2024 3:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>> [ Followup-To: set ]
>>>> 
>>>> In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> [ .... ]
>>>> 
>>>>> Olcott could not point to an error, but prefers to ignore it. So, I will
>>>>> repeat it, until either an error is found, or olcott admits that HHH
>>>>> cannot possibly simulate itself correctly.
>>>> 
>>>> This has the disadvantage of making your posts boring to read.  All but
>>>> one poster on this newsgroup KNOW that Olcott is wrong, here.
>>>> 
>>>> Continually repeating your argument won't get him to admit he's wrong.
>>>> Richard has been trying that for much longer than you have, with the
>>>> same lack of success.  Olcott's lack of capacity for abstract reasoning,
>>>> combined with his ignorance, combined with his arrogance, prevent him
>>>> learning at all.
>>>> 
>>>> May I suggest that you reconsider your strategy of endless repetition?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Rebuttals like yours are entirely baseless by failing to point out any
>>> mistake.
>> 
>> What makes you think taht Alan Mackenzie was trying to rebut what
>> Fred. Zwarts had said?
>> 
> 
> In other words you don't see the ad hominem attacks against
> me that are listed above?

You are lying again. That is not the same in other words.
I saw no rebuttals of ad hominem attacs against you.

-- 
Mikko