Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:42:00 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v88npo$j33d$8@dont-email.me>
References: <v7mup4$7vpf$1@solani.org> <lg8ea1Fa94U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonlp4azqw16000@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <lga2k1F7uk8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <xn0oonrftb7hazk002@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <v7olut$19iie$1@dont-email.me> <lga8vfF8qq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7q9vj$1l9co$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7qn3b$2hg0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgcm26Fbd6U4@mid.individual.net>
 <v7rfko$18sp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgda8oF3c6aU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7tiln$2g2b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v7u2gu$2co3l$1@dont-email.me> <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7uduv$11n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v80bgk$2s7ns$1@dont-email.me>
 <v83f93$31ac$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v860er$1kea$1@dont-email.me> <v86141$j$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v87e4d$ckpm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v87u43$1kl6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:42:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3eb9958d5eea0c84948681d44f52d8dc";
	logging-data="625773"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vXWPnMrgO3n5veOTHled8zByolIq0g6I="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bUgPSnABOR9Oqx6OBuj8VzUEMKQ=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <v87u43$1kl6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Bytes: 3118

On 2024-07-29 04:23, Andrew wrote:
> Chris wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:50:53 -0000 (UTC) :
> 
>>> You not comprehending the difference between zero percent of Apple reports
>>> versus zero total convictions is how I know you zealots own subnormal IQs.
>>
>> Not at all. My position hasn't changed. You, however, have had about three
>> different positions on this thread and keep getting confused which one
>> you're arguing for. lol.
> 
> Au contraire
> 
> Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never
> changed, Chris, and the fact you "think" it has changed is simply that you
> don't know the difference between the percentage of convictions based on
> the number of reports, and the total number of convictions.
> 
> When you figure out that those two things are different, then (and only
> then) will you realize I've maintained the same position throughout.
> 
> Specifically....
> 
> a. If the Apple reporting rate is low, and yet if their conviction
>     rate is high (based on the number of reports), then they are NOT
>     underreporting images.

Apple's reporting rate is ZERO, because they're not doing scanning of 
images of any kind.