Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vabp2o$195k4$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: If [Trumpery] means (see below), What does [Kamalary] mean?
Followup-To: alt.usage.english
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 05:54:48 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vabp2o$195k4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vab965$13hfb$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 06:54:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a6f7d5b3529530ac20bce813b9264d63";
	logging-data="1349252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19j00IYaR3Q6CyDhGQkgzXd"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v8HCU0Iw8lZTI2toT0/PqWiGhjY=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vab965$13hfb$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2424

Le 24/08/2024 à 01:23, HenHanna a écrit :
> 
> If   [Trumpery]  means (see below),  What does  [Kamalary]  mean?
> 
> 
>       \TRUMP-uh-ree\ • noun.
>                   1 : worthless nonsense
>                   2 : trivial or useless articles : junk.
> 
> 1. something without use or value; rubbish; trash; worthless stuff ·
> 2. nonsense; twaddle.

Ah yes, the old 'trumpery' joke.

As an outsider, there are things I don't understand. For instance: Trump 
said he wanted to make America great again (it may have been 'grate'; 
I've heard it but not seen it written). Harris now says that America is 
the greatest nation on Earth. Is she saying that Trump succeeded?

(Pots and kettles? Scotland did for a while describe itself as "the best 
small country in the world". No-one ever did explain how those 
responsible had arrived at that conclusion.

<https://electriccanadian.com/canada/pics/scotb1.jpg>)

I do wonder at the amount of time the BBC devotes to American elections. 
Given that US elections drag on and on, for months and months - or is it 
years? - and that there is some coverage every day, I suspect it adds up 
to far more than our national broadcaster gives to British elections. If 
so, is this right and proportionate? It's certainly tiresome.

FU2 aue alone.