Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vct1k4$2tic0$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: is Vax addressing sane today
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:37:25 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <vct1k4$2tic0$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vbd6b9$g147$1@dont-email.me>
	<2024Sep10.094353@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vckf9d$178f2$1@dont-email.me>
	<O2DHO.184073$kxD8.113118@fx11.iad> <vcso7k$2s2da$1@dont-email.me>
	<3b7a257101d09e1995314aadace0e14f@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:37:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43fa132f54fd9f5c91573130fd9389bf";
	logging-data="3066240"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+C133x0fEG1cO8Tte55nFA"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EimNqcszlt2NVswj1UlVXSrnliM=
Bytes: 1594

On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:17:02 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:

> You argue that trap-on-overflow as an instruction is unnecessary
> AND
> You argue that overflow detection is worthwhile
> AND
> You argue that ALU should not raise overflow exceptions
> 
> I am at a loss for how to take all 3 arguments together at the same time
> !?! Can you explain ??

The answer is pretty obvious: explicit instruction to branch on overflow 
detection.