Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vgptpa$aeoa$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:18:35 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <vgptpa$aeoa$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vgab11$st52$3@dont-email.me>
 <ecffc7c0-05a2-42df-bf4c-8ae3c2f809d6@att.net> <vgb0ep$11df5$4@dont-email.me>
 <35794ceb-825a-45df-a55b-0a879cfe80ae@att.net> <vgfgpo$22pcv$1@dont-email.me>
 <40ac3ed2-5648-48c0-ac8f-61bdfd1c1e20@att.net> <vgg57o$25ovs$2@dont-email.me>
 <71fea361-0069-4a98-89a4-6de2eef62c5e@att.net> <vggh9v$27rg8$3@dont-email.me>
 <ff2c4d7c-33b4-4aad-a6b2-88799097b86b@att.net> <vghuoc$2j3sg$1@dont-email.me>
 <d79e791d-d670-4a5a-bd26-fdf72bcde6bc@att.net> <vgj4lk$2ova9$3@dont-email.me>
 <f154138e-4482-4267-9332-151e2fd9f1ba@att.net> <vgkoi7$b5pp$1@solani.org>
 <d780ead415ff3a62ccd9b606bcd743fea3d8002c@i2pn2.org>
 <vglf32$396r8$1@dont-email.me>
 <521668acd2ed6184f2f2e36f67fdb1bc3a997524@i2pn2.org>
 <vglslt$3bl8n$1@dont-email.me> <vglso1$3bl8n$2@dont-email.me>
 <vgokv7$n50i$1@solani.org> <vgol5o$3vr0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgom45$3vvgt$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:18:35 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6d27a5651dfa207b787fe162a49abcc";
	logging-data="342794"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+me1mF/vhVs48w53FMcacR2d9SziXU1H4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:U9ipLW2ytAak7NooBRHpQFK66sI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vgom45$3vvgt$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2190

On 09.11.2024 23:01, Moebius wrote:

> It confirms only that both sets have the same size, actually aleph_0.

True but irrelevant. For covering of all rationals by all naturals there 
must be the same reality, but that is not.

Regards, WM